When J.R.R. Tolkien penned The Lord of the Rings in the 1940s and 50s, he probably didn’t anticipate that decades later, scholars would be dissecting his female characters with the intensity of Gandalf examining the One Ring. Yet here we are in 2025, still debating whether Galadriel is a Mary figure or a fallen angel, and whether Éowyn’s choice to become a healer represents empowerment or capitulation to patriarchal expectations.

The conversation around female representation in fantasy has evolved dramatically since Tolkien’s time. Today’s audiences expect complex, agency-driven female characters who don’t exist solely to motivate male protagonists—a standard that makes The Lord of the Rings both a fascinating time capsule and a work that continues to spark debate. When Peter Jackson adapted the trilogy for film in the early 2000s, he faced the challenge of updating these mid-20th century characterizations for modern audiences while remaining faithful to Tolkien’s vision. The results? A mixed bag that illuminates both the progress we’ve made and the limitations we still grapple with in fantasy storytelling.

Galadriel: The Lady of Constant Revision

Perhaps no character better illustrates Tolkien’s evolving understanding of his female characters than Galadriel. The author spent decades tinkering with her backstory, creating multiple, sometimes contradictory versions of her past. In some accounts, she’s a rebellious leader who participated in the Noldor’s flight from Valinor; in others, she’s “unstained,” having committed no evil deeds. As late as 1973—just months before his death—Tolkien was still rewriting her origin story, seemingly unable to decide whether she was a penitent seeking redemption or a pure figure who had always acted righteously.

This constant revision suggests Tolkien himself was uncertain about how to balance Galadriel’s power with traditional feminine virtues. Scholar Jane Beal points out that Tolkien’s 1973 description of Galadriel as “unstained” transforms her into a distinctly Marian figure—pure, wise, and untouched by the corruption that affects other characters. Yet this sanitized version sits uneasily with the more complex Galadriel of The Lord of the Rings, who admits to having once harbored ambitions for power and dominion.

In the books, Galadriel functions as what scholar Sarah Downey calls a “medieval celestial lady”—a guide figure reminiscent of Dante’s Beatrice. She’s ethereal, wise, and connected to divine light, but crucially, she’s also tempted. When Frodo offers her the One Ring, her response is both terrifying and sublime: “All shall love me and despair!” This moment of temptation—and her ultimate refusal—forms the crux of her character arc.

Jackson’s film adaptation, with Cate Blanchett’s mesmerizing performance, amplifies both Galadriel’s otherworldly power and her fundamental goodness. The films lean heavily into her role as a cosmic force for good, complete with the ethereal lighting and flowing gowns that have become visual shorthand for “mystical elf lady.” While Blanchett brings gravitas and genuine menace to Galadriel’s temptation scene, the films don’t quite capture the complexity of Tolkien’s various versions—though to be fair, even Tolkien couldn’t decide which version he preferred.

Arwen: The Reduction of the Evenstar

If Galadriel represents Tolkien’s uncertainty about powerful women, Arwen represents something more troubling: the reduction of a woman to her relationship with a man. In the books, Arwen appears sparingly, functioning more as inspiration than character. She’s beautiful, she’s wise, and she’s willing to sacrifice her immortality for love—a romantic notion that reads differently in our current era of examining women’s agency in their own stories.

Tolkien himself seems to have recognized Arwen’s limited role. Scholar Carol Leibiger notes that Arwen’s lack of involvement follows the general Elvish pattern of retreating to safe havens—but this explanation feels thin when applied to someone who’s supposedly one of the most important figures in Middle-earth’s Third Age.

Jackson’s adaptation initially attempted to give Arwen more agency. Early scripts had her fighting at Helm’s Deep and personally delivering Andúril to Aragorn. Some of these scenes were even filmed before the creative team, with Liv Tyler’s input, decided that warrior-princess Arwen felt inconsistent with the character’s essence. The final films split the difference: Tyler’s Arwen gets the memorable river-chase sequence (replacing the elf-lord Glorfindel from the books) and some moments of otherworldly power, but she spends most of the trilogy either pining for Aragorn or slowly dying due to her mystical connection to the Ring.

This change reflects a persistent challenge in adapting older works: how do you honor the original while addressing its limitations? Jackson’s team recognized that book-Arwen was too passive for modern audiences, but their solution—making her fate dependent on the Ring’s destruction—arguably made her even more of a prize to be won rather than a person with her own motivations.

The films’ introduction of the Evenstar pendant creates a tangible symbol of Arwen and Aragorn’s relationship, but it also reduces her to a love token. Contemporary fantasy increasingly recognizes that romance can coexist with individual agency, but The Lord of the Rings struggles with this balance in both mediums.

Éowyn: The Shieldmaiden’s Dilemma

Éowyn presents the most complex case study in the trilogy’s treatment of women. She’s the character who most directly confronts the restrictions placed on women in her society, declaring, “I am no man!” as she strikes down the Witch-king of Angmar. It’s a moment that has become iconic in fantasy literature and cinema—the literal fulfillment of prophecy through a technicality that feels both empowering and slightly absurd.

In the books, Éowyn’s arc follows a clear trajectory: from frustrated noblewoman to disguised warrior to healer and wife. Tolkien presents this progression as character growth, with Éowyn explicitly renouncing her desire for military glory in favor of nurturing life. Her declaration that she will “be a healer, and love all things that grow and are not barren” reads as a woman finding her true calling—or as a convenient way to domesticate a troublesome female character, depending on your perspective.

Scholar Melissa Hatcher argues that Éowyn’s choice represents Tolkien’s “highest ideal: a fierce commitment to peace.” This interpretation frames her transition not as surrender but as evolution toward a more profound form of strength. Yet it’s hard to ignore that this evolution involves abandoning her martial skills and accepting a traditional feminine role as healer and mother.

Jackson’s films, with Miranda Otto’s compelling performance, emphasize Éowyn’s warrior aspects while maintaining her romantic arc. The films spend more time showing her combat training and her frustration with being sidelined. Otto brings a fierce intelligence to the role that makes Éowyn’s ultimate choice feel more genuine—she’s not just accepting domesticity; she’s choosing a different path after proving herself as a warrior.

Interestingly, the films faced studio pressure to simplify Éowyn’s role by having Aragorn marry her instead of Arwen—essentially solving the “too many female characters” problem by elimination. That Jackson’s team resisted this pressure speaks to their understanding that Éowyn’s value doesn’t lie in whom she marries but in her journey toward self-determination.

The Broader Context: Where Are All the Women?

Beyond the central trio, The Lord of the Rings notably lacks female presence. Tolkien himself acknowledged this limitation, though his explanations varied from the practical (it was a war story) to the mythological (he was drawing on masculine-coded sources like Beowulf). This absence becomes more glaring when viewed alongside contemporary fantasy, which has largely moved beyond the assumption that epic stories must be male-dominated.

The films address this somewhat by expanding existing female roles—Arwen’s rescue of Frodo, more screen time for Galadriel’s wisdom, Éowyn’s extended training sequences—but they can’t fundamentally alter the source material’s gender imbalance. When The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power premiered in 2022 with a more diverse cast including prominent female characters, some fans complained about departure from Tolkien’s vision, highlighting ongoing tensions between fidelity to source material and contemporary values.

Evolution and Expectations

The treatment of women in The Lord of the Rings reflects both its time of creation and the ongoing challenges of adapting classic works. Tolkien’s female characters operate within the constraints of 1940s and 50s gender expectations, yet they also push against those boundaries in ways that were probably progressive for their era. Galadriel wields power that surpasses most male characters; Arwen makes a choice that defies her father’s expectations; Éowyn literally breaks through gender barriers to achieve military victory.

Jackson’s adaptations, created in the early 2000s, navigate between honoring Tolkien’s vision and meeting contemporary expectations for female representation. The results are imperfect but thoughtful—recognizing both the limitations of the source material and the importance of giving women agency within the story’s framework.

Contemporary fantasy has largely moved beyond the patterns established by The Lord of the Rings. Works like N.K. Jemisin’s Broken Earth trilogy, Rebecca Roanhorse’s Between Earth and Sky series, and even more traditional fantasy like Brandon Sanderson’s cosmere novels feature women as complex protagonists rather than inspirational figures or prizes to be won. This evolution doesn’t diminish Tolkien’s achievement but rather shows how the genre has grown.

The Lasting Legacy

The Lord of the Rings remains a masterpiece of fantasy literature and cinema, but its treatment of female characters serves as a useful mirror for examining how our expectations and values have evolved. Galadriel, Arwen, and Éowyn each represent different approaches to female power within traditional fantasy frameworks—the wise counselor, the sacrificial lover, and the disguised warrior—archetypes that continue to influence fantasy storytelling even as authors work to complicate and expand them.

The ongoing discussions about these characters demonstrate something important: audiences care deeply about representation and are willing to engage critically with beloved works. This isn’t about canceling Tolkien or dismissing Jackson’s adaptations, but rather about understanding how stories reflect and shape cultural values.

Perhaps the most telling aspect of the female characters in The Lord of the Rings is how much scholarly and fan attention they’ve received despite their limited presence in the narrative. Galadriel, Arwen, and Éowyn have inspired countless analyses, adaptations, and reimaginings precisely because readers and viewers recognize both their potential and their constraints. They represent a fantasy genre learning to grapple with questions of power, agency, and representation that remain relevant today.

As we continue to expand what fantasy can be and whom it can include, The Lord of the Rings serves as both foundation and cautionary tale—showing us how far we’ve come and reminding us that even beloved works can be examined with both appreciation and critical insight.

---

What do you think about the evolution of female characters in fantasy? Do Galadriel, Arwen, and Éowyn still resonate with modern audiences, or do their limitations overshadow their contributions to the genre? Share your thoughts in the comments below.