26 – 1917

Welcome to The Best Movies I’ve Never Seen! This is the part of the blog where I work my way through 100 films I’ve never seen that are generally considered to be great. You’re invited to watch along with me if you can find a copy or find it streaming. So grab some popcorn and let’s get started!

1917

2019

Directed by Sam Mendes

In Sam Mendes’ 1917, the visceral reality of World War I unfolds in a breathtaking one-shot cinematic masterpiece. The film centers on Lance Corporals William Schofield and Tom Blake, charged with delivering a life-or-death message across enemy lines to prevent the massacre of 1,600 men. As the duo navigates the harrowing landscapes of war-torn France, Mendes immerses the audience in a relentless and suspenseful tale of sacrifice, brotherhood, and the unrelenting march of time.

The film’s brilliance lies not only in its technical prowess—capturing the intensity of war in a seemingly continuous shot—but in its ability to forge a profound emotional connection with the characters. George MacKay, who portrays Schofield, delivers a powerful and nuanced performance, capturing the toll of war on an individual’s psyche. The supporting cast is equally commendable, with Dean-Charles Chapman as Blake leaving a lasting impression with his genuine and heartfelt portrayal.

From the abandoned German trenches to the scorched battlefields and desolate landscapes, Roger Deakins’ cinematography is nothing short of awe-inspiring. The seamless transitions through the chaos of war draw viewers into the characters’ journey, intensifying the impact of each moment. The decision to unfold the story in real-time adds a layer of urgency, amplifying the suspense as the protagonists navigate a labyrinth of danger.

One of the film’s most poignant scenes occurs when Schofield and Blake encounter a downed German pilot. The ensuing struggle showcases the harsh realities of war and underscores the theme of humanity amidst chaos. Blake’s tragic fate serves as a gut-wrenching reminder of the unpredictable nature of conflict and the profound sacrifices made on the battlefield.

The film’s sound design, composed by Thomas Newman, complements the visual spectacle, heightening the emotional beats and immersing the audience in the cacophony of war. The haunting score lingers long after the credits roll, echoing the film’s exploration of the enduring impact of conflict on those who survive.

1917 is not just a war film; it’s a testament to the resilience of the human spirit. As Schofield races against time, the audience is compelled to confront the brutality of war alongside him. Mendes masterfully weaves together elements of suspense, tragedy, and humanity, creating an unforgettable cinematic experience.

As I reflect on 1917, I find myself drawn to the film’s ability to transcend the genre, leaving viewers with a profound sense of the human cost of war. The emotional weight of the narrative lingers, inviting contemplation on the futility of conflict and the enduring power of camaraderie.

I encourage fellow cinephiles to share their thoughts on 1917 in the comments below. Did the film’s technical brilliance resonate with you, or were you captivated by the emotional journey of the characters? Let’s engage in a discussion about this remarkable cinematic achievement.

8 thoughts on “26 – 1917

  1. 1917 should’ve won Best Picture for its technical brilliance alone. Yet Sam Mendes manages to keep the story just as engaging. It’s probably the best War picture I’ve seen from the last decade.

    P.S. I see you finally have a quarter left to go. I look forward to seeing you finish this series. Good luck!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment